Goldstein v. Moatz’s Empirical Analysis
364 F.3d 205 · 2004
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2025
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Imbler v. Pachtman · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Butz v. Economou
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. at 5-6. Goldstein has appealed the Fee Order (Appeal No. 05-1399). The two appeals were consolidated for handling in this Court, and we possess jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. II. A. 9 Oral argument was conducted in the two consolidated appeals before this Court on February 1, 2006. Thereafter, on March 2, 2006, the PTO filed a motion to dismiss Appeal No. 05-1144 (the Mootness Order appeal), asserting that, by its letter to Goldstein's counsel of February 27, 2006, the PTO had notified Goldstein of its decision not to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goldstein v. Moatz“We note that ... it is not necessary to determine whether Goldstein has alleged a constitutional violation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goldstein v. Moatz“), and the PTO's Office of Enrollment and Discipline (the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Goldstein v. Moatz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.