Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 F.3d 424 - Davis v. Rodriguez

Davis v. Rodriguez’s Empirical Analysis

364 F.3d 424 · 2004

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 16 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Jaegly v. Couch (2006), Kerman v. City of New York (2004)

15 federal appellate · 16 district · 2 state decisions

430200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Pierson v. Ray · City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc. · Weyant v. Okst · Singer v. Fulton County Sheriff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to the law of the state in which the arrest occurred.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “common law, as modified and changed by the constitution and statutes”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Id. at 396 , 109 S.Ct. 1865 ; Soares v. Connecticut, 8 F.3d 917, 921 (2d Cir.1993). Davis's question was directly relevant to the excessive force claim because the reasonableness of the force used was partly dependent on the crime in question. We thus hold that the court's decision to preclude that line of questioning was an abuse of discretion. 41 Of course, a new trial should be granted only”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.