Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 F.3d 60 - Palmer v. Richards

Palmer v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis

364 F.3d 60 · 2004

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Iqbal v. Hasty (2007), Ortiz v. McBride (2004)

13 federal appellate ·

350200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Sandin v. Conner · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Johnson v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n the absence of a detailed factual record,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “could constitute atypical and significant hardships if the conditions were more severe than the normal SHU conditions of Sealy or a more fully developed record showed that even relatively brief confinements under normal SHU conditions were, in fact, atypical.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] prisoner's liberty interest is implicated by prison discipline, such as SHU confinement, only if the discipline 'imposes [an] atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.