364 Ill. App. 3d 587 - Hudkins v. Egan’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2020
3 federal appellate · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 131 Ill. 2d 403 - Wyness v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. · 345 Ill. App. 3d 992 - P.J.'s Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Nextel West Corp. · 257 Ill. App. 3d 905 - Pagano v. Occidental Chemical Corp. · 216 Ill. App. 3d 962 - Sanke v. Bechina · 359 Ill. App. 3d 897 - Bauer v. Giannis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When the trial court, in making an interlocutory order not otherwise appealable, finds that the order involves a question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, the court shall so state in writing, identifying the question of law involved. *** The Appellate Court may thereupon in its discretion allow an appeal from the order.” 155 Ill. 2d R. 308(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The scope of review in an interlocutory appeal under Rule 308 is ordinarily limited to the question certified by the trial court, which, because it must be a question of law, is reviewed de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Lewis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.