Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 Md. 192 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
4
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Khalifa v. State (2004), Roary v. State (2005)

58 state decisions

300200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Rose v. Clark · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is also well settled that only three grounds for appellate review of sentences are recognized in this State: (1) whether the sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment or violates other constitutional requirements; (2) whether the sentencing judge was motivated by ill-will, prejudice or other impermissible considerations; and (3) whether the sentence is within statutory limits.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is well settled in Maryland that fundamental to a defendant's right to a fair trial is an impartial and disinterested judge,””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “there is a sufficient risk that a reasonable observer, hearing or reading the quoted remarks, might infer. . . that [the defendant's] ethnicity and alien status played a role in determining her sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.