Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 Md. 354 - Holbrook v. State

Holbrook v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
3
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Fisher and Utley v. State (2001), Melton v. State (2004)

2 federal appellate · 74 state decisions

470200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Brown v. Ohio · Missouri v. Hunter · United States v. Dixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`doubt or ambiguity as to whether the legislature intended that there be multiple punishments for the same act or transaction[.]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “acting with intent to harm a person or property,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “§ 3-202. Assault in the first degree. (a) Prohibited. — (1) A person may not intentionally cause or attempt to cause serious physical injury to another. (2) A person may not commit an assault with a firearm _ _ [ 8 ] C.L. § 3-204 provides, in part: Reckless endangerment. (a) Prohibited. — A person may not recklessly: (1) engage in conduct that creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another; or (2) discharge a firearm from a motor vehicle in a manner that creates a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.