Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 Mo. 1 - McDaniel v. Kerr

McDaniel v. Kerr’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
September 1982
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 1982 · most notably 9 Ill. 2d 407 - Moushon v. National Garages, Inc. (1956), Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. Robles (1973)

35 state decisions

1501953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKay v. Delico Meat Products Co. · State Ex Rel. Hussmann-Ligonier Co. v. Hughes · Wolf v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works · Downey v. Kansas City Gas Co. · Margaret Joyce v. Luse-Stevenson Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““3. The term ‘injury’ and ‘personal injuries’ shall mean only violence to the physical structure of the body and such disease or infection as naturally results therefrom. The said terms shall in no case except as herein provided be construed to include occupational disease in any form, nor shall they be construed to include any contagious or infectious disease contracted during the course of the employment, nor shall they include death due to natural causes occurring while the workman is at work.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““2. The word ‘accident’ as used in this chapter shall, unless a different meaning is clearly indicated by the context, be construed to mean an unexpected or unforeseen event happening suddenly and violently, with or without human fault and producing at the time objective symptoms of an injury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The plaintiff’s cause was not submitted as an action to recover for ‘an occupational disease’, nor on negligence by reason of the violation of the occupational disease statutes, now Sections 292.300, et seq., RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.