Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 Mo. 1221 - State v. Reese

State v. Reese’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

489
cited by 489 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

489 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 489 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably State v. Bernard (1993), State v. Sladek (1992)

489 state decisions

16001954196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. . Molineux · State v. Lyle · State v. Shilkett · State v. Spinks · State v. Buxton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 489 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The acid test is its logical relevancy to the particular excepted purpose or purposes for which it is sought to be introduced. If it is logically pertinent in that it reasonably tends to prove a material fact in issue, it is not to be rejected merely because it incidentally proves the defendant guilty of another crime.’ ””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Generally speaking, evidence of other crimes is competent to prove the specific crime charged when it tends to establish (1) motive; (2) intent; (3) the absence of mistake or accident; (4) a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the other; (5) the identity of the person charged with the commission of the crime on trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence of other crimes, when not properly related to the cause on trial, violates defendant’s right to be tried for the offense for which he is indicted. State v. Shilkett, 356 Mo. 1081 , 204 S.W.2d 920, 922-23 [(1947)].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.