Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 Mo. 759 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2004

19 state decisions

80195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Coffey · State v. Butler · Commonwealth v. Mannos · United States v. Michael · United States v. East Side Canal & Irrigation Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If there be at any time pending against the same defendant two indictments for the same offense, or two indictments for the same matter, although charged as different offenses, the indictment first found shall be deemed to be suspended by such second indictment, and shall be quashed."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to hold that by merely making some statement in the record, without a request for any action by the Court (when affirmative action would be required to accomplish anything), a party can claim the Court erred in failing to take some action which was not requested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a party, at the time the ruling or order is ... sought, makes known to the court that action which he desires the court to take.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.