Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

364 N.C. 328

701 S.E.2d 669

Docket No. 270P10.

State v. Foreman

STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick Rochell FOREMAN.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 26, 2010.

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2010-08-26

Relies on 193 N.C. App. 420 - Huebner v. Triangle Research Collaborative · 158 N.C. App. 738 - State v. Rush

Decided 2010-08-26

¶1Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

¶2Nicholas C. Woomer-Deters, for Derrick Rochell Foreman.

¶3

ORDER

¶4The state's petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order:

¶5Rule of Appellate Procedure 21(c) mandates that petitions for writ of certiorari "shall be filed without unreasonable delay." See, e.g., State v. Rush, 158 N.C.App. 738, 741, 582 S.E.2d 37 (2003) (finding that "fouryear delay in challenging a judgment constitutes `unreasonable delay'" under Rule 21(c)); Huebner v. Triangle Research Collaborative, 193 N.C.App. 420, 426, 667 S.E.2d 309 (2008) (holding that defendant's three-year delay in requesting certiorari review constituted "unreasonable delay" under Rule 21(c)). Defendant's thirteen-year delay in filing his petition for writ of certiorari in the Court of Appeals constituted unreasonable delay. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals' order allowing defendant's petition for writ of certiorari is reversed and defendant's appeal is dismissed.

/364/nc/328 · .json · Public domain