Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 N.C. 443 - State v. Waring

State v. Waring’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

63 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Batson v. Kentucky · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Wainwright v. Witt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fail[s] to preserve issues relating to [a] motion to suppress, we review for plain error”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The standard of review for assessing alleged improper closing arguments that fail to provoke timely objection from opposing counsel is whether the remarks were so grossly improper that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to intervene ex mero motu .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “specifically and distinctly assign[s] plain error”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.