Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 NW2D 536 - State v. Feiok

State v. Feiok’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
August 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2004

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

70198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · United States v. Ward · Ex parte Lange · Ex Parte Nielsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Whether the sanction involves an affirmative disability or restraint, (2) whether it has historically been regarded as a punishment, (3) whether it comes into play only on a finding of scienter, (4) whether its operation will promote the traditional aims of punishment—retribution and deterrence, (5) whether the behavior to which it applies is already a crime, (6) whether an alternative purpose to which it may rationally be connected is assignable for it, and (7) whether it appears excessive in relation to the alternative purpose assigned.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person who is convicted of the offense of operating a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state with weight upon any wheel, axle or groups of axles or upon more than one thereof greater than the maximum permitted by section 44.0336 of the South Dakota Code of 1939 and acts amendatory thereof shall be fined in addition to and not in substitution for any and all penalties now provided by law for such offense in the following amounts: In an amount equal to three cents per pound for each pound of such excess or combined excess weight over one thousand pounds when such excess is two thousand pounds or less. In an amount equal to five cents per pound for each pound of such excess or combined excess weight when such excess exceeds two thousand pounds and is three thousand pounds or less. In an amount equal to six cents per pound for each pound of such excess or combined excess weight when such excess exceeds three thousand pounds and is four thousand pounds or less. In an amount equal to eight cents per pound for each pound of such excess or combined excess weight when such excess exceeds four thousand pounds and is five thousand pounds or less. In an amount equal to ten cents per pound for each pound of such excess or combined excess weight when such excess is five thousand pounds or more. In any case where the motor vehicle is absolutely overweight beyond the greatest permissible compensation plate weights for a vehicle of its class, the pounds by which the vehicle ”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The fine schedule in this section is assessed at a single rate according to the cents per pound penalty for the highest weight violation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.