Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 Or. 410 - State v. Edmonds

State v. Edmonds’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Oates · Harris v. McRae · State v. Gaines · United States v. Grady · Evanston v. Gunn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[w]hen a general and particular provision are inconsistent, the latter is paramount to the former so that a particular intent controls a general intent that is inconsistent with the particular intent."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he reason for that doctrine is that 'the specific provision comes closer to addressing the very problem posed by the case at hand and is thus more deserving of credence.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'general permission that is contradicted by a specific prohibition'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.