Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 So. 2d 1011 - State v. Constantine

364 So. 2d 1011 - State v. Constantine’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar (1982), State v. Prestridge (1981)

41 state decisions

22019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 278 So. 2d 781 - State v. Moore · 345 So. 2d 874 - State v. Passman · State v. Monroe · State v. Weathers · 356 So. 2d 974 - State v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Matters which are, ... logically relevant to issues before the jury should not be excluded merely because they show the accused has committed other offenses." 364 So.2d at 1014 .”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Relevant evidence is that tending to show the commission of the offense and the intent, or tending to negative the commission of the offense and the intent. Facts necessary to be known to explain a relevant fact, or which support an inference raised by such fact, are admissible."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]nother crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.