Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 SO2D 766 - Gari v. State

Gari v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2004
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2004

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

201978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Talley v. State · Crosby v. State · Haddock v. State · 272 So. 2d 867 - Raysor v. State · 304 So. 2d 493 - Grimsley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"a defendant offering no testimony in his or her own behalf, except the defendant's own, shall be entitled to the concluding argument before the jury."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Zackery v. State · Hart v. State
  2. “"After introducing the appellant's Spanish, handwritten statement, the state caused the statement to be read to the jury in English by a translator. It was only thereafter that the appellant introduced as an exhibit an English transcription of the same statement. Under these circumstances, the appellant's introduction of this exhibit could not deprive him of his important right to make the concluding argument."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Zackery v. State
  3. “The state properly notes that, ordinarily, the introduction of documentary evidence by a defendant forfeits his right to make the concluding argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Zackery v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.