¶1Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused his discretion in revoking appellant’s probation. The order of revocation of probation is accordingly affirmed. However, the provision in appellant’s sentence that he be confined “at hard labor” is not authorized by law, is surplus-age and as such is hereby stricken. Massey v. State, 351 So.2d 376 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). As amended, the sentence is affirmed.
364 So. 2d 869
Sims v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 5, 1978
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-12-05
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1987
2 state decisions
Relies on Massey v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1978-12-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →