State v. Hawthorne’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1997
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 304 So. 2d 300 - State v. Kaufman · 353 So. 2d 978 - State v. Qualls · State v. Hayes · 284 So. 2d 536 - State v. Tharp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is only when the witness has no independent recollection of what occurred, and his testimony is the product of what he has just read in his report prepared at an earlier time, that the defense is entitled to examine the report for the purpose of cross-examining the witness. (Citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.