Padgett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McGuire v. City of Dallas · 161 Tex. Crim. 124 - Dominguez v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 286 - Killingsworth v. State · 172 Tex. Crim. 556 - Gonzales v. State · 162 Tex. Crim. 103 - Hopkins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"While used extensively in the federal courts of this country, a motion to suppress evidence in advance of proffer does not obtain in this state. Johnson v. State, 111 Tex.Cr.R. 395 , 13 S.W.2d 114 ; Bailey v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 315 , 248 S.W.2d 144 ; Spencer v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 496 , 250 S.W.2d 199 ; Dominguez v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 124 , 275 S.W.2d 677 ; Gonzales v. State [ 172 Tex.Cr.R. 556 ], 361 S.W.2d 393 . The motion does not qualify as an informal bill under Art. 760e, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. We find no authority to suggest a change, and we still follow the rule in this state that timely objection is to be made at the time the evidence is offered. Killingsworth v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 286 , 306 S.W.2d 715 , and cases there cited."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.