¶1 Order
¶2 Roy Thompson appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. He contends the motion court clearly erred by failing to enter specific findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding a claim raised in his pro se Rule 24.035 motion. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.
¶3 AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).