Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 364 SW3D 837 - Lackey v. State

Lackey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana))

Relationships

Relies on Marin v. State · Lankston v. State · Young v. State · Crane v. State · Nix v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[qjuestions of procedural default are systemic, meaning that a court of appeals may not reverse a conviction without first addressing any potential issue of procedural default, even sua sponte.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “with sufficient specificity to make the trial court aware of the complaint, unless the specific grounds were apparent from the context.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “notice of the procedural irregularity and an adequate opportunity to take appropriate corrective action”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.