State v. Patrick I. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “When presented with a question of constitutional fact, this court engages in a two-step inquiry. First, we review the circuit court's findings of historical fact under a deferential standard, upholding them unless they are clearly erroneous. Second, we independently apply constitutional principles to those facts.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 382 Wis. 2d 92 - State v. Steven T. Delap

2. “(1) the temporal proximity of the official misconduct and seizure of evidence; (2) the presence of intervening circumstances; and (3) the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 384 Wis. 2d 271 - State v. Marek

3. “An expansion in the scope of the inquiry, when accompanied by an extension of time longer than would have been needed for the original stop, must be supported by reasonable suspicion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 388 Wis. 2d 161 - State v. Brown