Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 A2D 254 - In Re MAC

In Re MAC’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2009

10 state decisions

301976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Sosna v. Iowa · In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88 · In Re John Ballay, A/K/A Figeret Hoxha, Patient · In Re Geraghty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “capable of repetition, yet evading review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re JS

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.