Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 A2D 626 - Cooper v. Saunders-Hunt

Cooper v. Saunders-Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2000

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

801976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snyder v. Hillegeist · Libby v. L. J. Corp. · Miller v. Salabes · Holst v. Butler · Snyder v. Hillegeist

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An oral partnership agreement [for an indefinite period of time] would not run afoul of the Statute of Frauds since no term of years was ever fixed and therefore it was capable of performance within one year.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.