Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 F.2d 389 - United States v. Bottone

United States v. Bottone’s Empirical Analysis

365 F.2d 389 · 1966

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

77 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2014 · most notably Dowling v. United States (1985), Bottone v. United States (1966)

77 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

480196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Massiah v. United States · Lawn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he trier is entitled, in fact bound to consider the evidence as a whole, and, in law as in life, the effect of this generally is much greater than the sum of the parts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the transformation of the information in the stolen papers into a tangible object never possessed by the original owner should be deemed immaterial” where”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(t)o be sure, where no tangible objects were ever taken or transported, a court would be hard pressed to conclude that 'goods' had been stolen and transported within the meaning of § 2314.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.