Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 F.2d 404 - Fultz v. United States

Fultz v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

365 F.2d 404 · 1966

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 1975
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 4244 · 50 U.S.C. § 31

Relies on Von Moltke v. Gillies · On Lee v. United States · United States v. Lester · United States v. Davis · Easter v. District of Columbia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The representation of a defendant by counsel when he entered a plea of guilty would not, in itself, fulfill the requirements of the rule that a guilty plea shall not be accepted without first determining that it is made voluntarily with an understanding of the nature of the charge. United States v. Diggs, 304 F.2d 929 (C.A.6). It is the duty of a federal judge before accepting a plea of guilty to thoroughly investigate the circumstances under which it is made. United States v. Lester, 247 F.2d 496 (C.A.2).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.