Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 F.2d 448 - Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc.

Woody v. Sterling Aluminum Products, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

365 F.2d 448 · 1966

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2011
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2011 · most notably Vaca v. Sipes (1967), Abrams v. Carrier Corp. (1970)

27 federal appellate · 5 district ·

210196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox · Local 174 Teamsters Chaukfeurs Warehousemen Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Company · Smith v. Evening News Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * We think it is at least arguable that these allegations, if true, would be an unfair labor practice within the protection of § 7 and prohibition of § 8 of the Act ‘although there are differing views on whether a violation of the duty of fair representation is an unfair labor practice under the Labor Management Relations Act. * *■ *’ Humphrey v. Moore, 375 U.S. 335 , 84 S.Ct. 363 , 11 L.Ed.2d 370 (1964). Unlike Moore, however; plaintiffs’ allegations here are not contract oriented and not, therefore, ‘within the cognizance of federal and state courts.’ Smith v. Evening News Ass’n., supra.”'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““When an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the Act, the States as well as the federal courts must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board if the danger of state interference with national policy is to be averted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that individual employees wishing to assert contract grievances must attempt use of the contract grievance procedure agreed upon by employer and union as the mode of redress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.