Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

365 F.2d 831

Docket No. 20456.

Zaleck v. Wilson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-09-12

2 counsel of record

Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Ford v. Wilson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-09-12

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; Alfonso J. Zirpoli, Judge.

Marvin S. Kayne, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of Cal., Albert W. Harris, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Robt. R. Granucci, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HAMLEY, HAMLIN and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Johnson v. State of New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 requires rejection of appellant's contention that the rule of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977, should be applied retroactively to his in-custody interrogation.

¶2

Affirmed.

/365/f2d/831 · .json · Public domain