United States v. Marks’s Empirical Analysis
365 F.3d 101 · 2004
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2023
18 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Zannino · United States v. Sklar · United States v. Carrozza · United States v. Kipp · United States v. Jimenez-Perez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not enough merely to mention a possible argument in the most skeletal way, leaving the court to do counsel’s work.”)). 5 . The fact that Re-Ace has prevailed both at the injunction and summary judgment stages of this case in no way precludes Wheeled Coach from ultimately prevailing at trial, particularly on the basis of its”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“may choose between plausible estimates of drug quantity but must err on the side of caution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with the intent that [they] would or could be distributed”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.