Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 F.3d 156 - Corning Incorporated v. Picvue Electronics Ltd

Corning Incorporated v. Picvue Electronics Ltd’s Empirical Analysis

365 F.3d 156 · 2004

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
December 2023
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC (2011), RoDa Drilling Co. v. Siegal (2009)

6 federal appellate ·

120200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmidt v. Lessard · International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n · Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily Distajo · Sanders v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n · Register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No restraining order or preliminary injunction shall issue except upon the giving of security by the applicant, in such sum as the court deems proper, for the payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered by any party who is found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “reflects Congress' concern with the dangers inherent in the threat of a contempt citation for violation of an order so vague that an enjoined party may unwittingly and unintentionally transcend its bounds.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “describe in reasonable detail-and not by referring to the complaint or other document-the act or acts restrained or required.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.