Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 F.3d 582 - United States v. Salinas

United States v. Salinas’s Empirical Analysis

365 F.3d 582 · 2004

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

37 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Booker (2004), United States v. Pugh (2008)

37 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

580200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Tucker · United States v. Mustread · United States v. Taylor · United States v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rather than establishing guidelines governing the revocation of supervised release, the Sentencing Commission has opted to promulgate a series of policy statements, including a Revocation Table of recommended sentencing ranges tied to the severity of a defendant’s violations and criminal history category.... Although these policy statements are nonbinding, they are to be given “great weight” by the sentencing judge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]his court review[ed] a sentence imposed following revocation of a defendant's supervised release to ascertain whether it was `plainly unreasonable.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.