Armstrong v. Kemna’s Empirical Analysis
365 F.3d 622 · 2004
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Young · Schlup v. Delo · Morris v. Slappy · Remon Lee v. Mike Kemna Superintendent Crossroads Correctional Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings ... resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pfau v. Ault“resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pfau v. Ault
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.