Caliendo v. Warden of California Men's Colony’s Empirical Analysis
365 F.3d 691 · 2004
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Fields v. Brown (2007), Inthavong v. Lamarque (2005)
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · Williams v. Taylor · Smith v. Phillips · Remmer v. United States · Mattox v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it raise[d] a risk of influencing the verdict,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[p]rivate communications, possibly prejudicial, between jurors and third persons, or witnesses, or the officer in charge, are absolutely forbidden, and invalidate the verdict, at least unless their harmlessness is made to appear.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.