Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 F.3d 882 - Morgan v. McCotter

Morgan v. McCotter’s Empirical Analysis

365 F.3d 882 · 2004

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
3
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 11 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Initiative & Referendum Institute v. Walker (2006), United States Grynberg v. Praxair Inc (2004)

17 federal appellate · 11 district · 3 state decisions

280200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Warth v. Seldin · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “assuming the truth and validity of all of a plaintiff's factual allegations and legal theories, the due process protections would have alleviated any harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The issues of standing and ripeness are particularly difficult to divorce.”); McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Med. Ctr., 319 F.3d 63, 69 (1st Cir.2003) (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “There are three requirements of Article III standing. First, the plaintiff must suffer an injury in fact. An injury in fact is an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, i.e., not conjectural or hypothetical.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.