Lasprilla v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
365 F.3d 98 · 2004
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2023
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · El Moraghy v. Ashcroft · Zhang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Cesar Nascimento v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“had two opportunities — in his motion to reopen and in his motion to reconsider — to present a sufficient showing that he was within the exception and thus that the visa application was ‘approvable when filed,’ ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Butt v. Gonzales“We have found nothing in the regulations that requires the BIA to explain its reasons when deciding a motion to reconsider.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rumierz v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.