Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 FSUPP 725 - Schur v. Salzman

Schur v. Salzman’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably Whittaker v. Whittaker Corp. (1981), 490 F. Supp. 1 - Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. (1980)

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

1201973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 781 · 15 U.S.C. § 78P (§ 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. · Linkletter v. Walker · Sweet v. United States · Illinois ex rel. Kennedy v. Hurley · International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not only in his contention that unregistered stock cannot be matched against the registered stock without substance, but to sustain this claim would sanction an avenue of escape of the type that insiders from time to time contrive in an effort to retain profits derived from transactions which section 16(b) commands they surrender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “benefits substantially equivalent to ownership”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.