Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 FSUPP 747 - United States v. Kulp

United States v. Kulp’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 464 F. Supp. 1091 - United States v. Vignola (1979), 401 F. Supp. 66 - Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Kallir, Philips, Ross, Inc. (1975)

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

17019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2315

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Coolidge v. New Hampshire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] court may allow a party to withdraw from a stipulation if the moving party can prove that he relied to this detriment on representations that were untrue, or that the stipulation stemmed from fraud, accident, mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, or that some other reason justifies relief. See Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. Rakway, Inc., 189 F.Supp. 348 (E.D.Pa.1960); Rarick v. United Steelworkers of America, 202 F.Supp. 902 (W.D.Pa.1962).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.