Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 Mo. 656 - In Re Oliver

In Re Oliver’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2015

19 state decisions

1001956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Matter of Conner · In Re Disbarment Proceedings Against Conrad · Bybee v. S'renco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is always a ground for disbarment of an attorney that he has misappropriated the funds of his client, either by failing to pay over money collected by him for his client or by appropriating to his own use funds entrusted to his care, [citation omitted]. That respondent has made restitution of the converted funds is no defense to the charges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.