Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

365 N.C. 3

705 S.E.2d 734

Munger v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 2011

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2011-02-03

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2016

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-02-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Michael C. MUNGER, Barbara Howe, and Mark Whiteley Cares
v.
STATE of North Carolina; James T. Fain, III, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Commerce, in his official capacity; Reginald Hinton, Acting Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Revenue, in his official capacity; David T. McCoy, State Budget Officer for the Office of State Budget and Management, in his official capacity; Michael F. Easley, Governor of the State of North Carolina, in his official capacity; Google Inc.; and Madras Integration, LLC.

No. 130PA10.

¶1Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2011.

¶2Robert F. Orr and Jeanette K. Doran, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellants.

¶3Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellees State of North Carolina, James T. Fain, III, Reginald Hinton, David T. McCoy, and Michael F. Easley.

¶4Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Raleigh, by Burley B. Mitchell, Jr. and Pressly M. Millen, for defendant-appellees Google Inc. and Madras Integration, LLC.

¶5Troutman Sanders LLP, Raleigh, by William G. Scoggin, for North Carolina Economic Developers Association and the N.C. Chamber, amici curiae.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

¶8Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

/365/nc/3 · .json · Public domain