Holcomb v. Zinke’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2011
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 213 Cal. App. 2d 729 - Lingsch v. Savage · 76 Ill. App. 3d 638 - Posner v. Davis · Smith v. National Resort Communities, Inc. · Wilhite v. Mays · 140 Ga. App. 816 - Wilhite v. Mays
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to disclose material facts which are known or should be known to the seller and which would not be discoverable by the buyer's exercise of ordinary care and diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The right to rescind a contract on the ground of fraud is granted by North Dakota Century Code § 9-09-02(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Erickson v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.