Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 P.2d 739 - Grimes v. State

Grimes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2007

23 state decisions

11019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oxendine v. State · Robilio v. United States · Cody v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 110 - Hathcox v. State · 88 Okla. Crim. 299 - Doser v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Ordinarily error cannot be predicated upon mere unexplained excerpts from the remarks of counsel to the jury. Enough must appear of record to advise the appellate court of what preceded the alleged objectionable remarks and their meaning to be deduced from the context, and whether or not they were invited or provoked by remarks made by opposing counsel.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘Evidence of different offenses from the one charged are admissible when both offense are so closely linked as to form a part of res gestae.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““ . . . This court has repeatedly held that to entitle the defense of alibi to consideration, the evidence must be such as to show that at the very time of the commission of the crime charged the accused was at another place so far away or under such circumstances that he could not, with ordinary exertion, have reached the place where the crime was committed so as to have participated in the commission thereof. . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.