Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 PA 18 - McDevitt v. McDevitt

McDevitt v. McDevitt’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 1987 · most notably State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Williams (1978), Emmaus Municipal Authority v. Eltz (1964)

3 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

1101950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U. · Canuso v. Philadelphia · J. S. Cornell & Son, Inc. v. Rosenwald · Navarro Corp. v. Pittsburgh School District · Margolies v. Zimmerman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . But in the present instance it seems to be agreed by both parties that the arbitration under the partnership agreement was to be governed by the Act of April 25, 1927, P.L. 381; that Act provides (section 11(d)) that the court shall modify or correct the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration where the award is against the law and is such that had it been a verdict of the jury the court would have entered a different or other judgment notwithstanding the verdict; therefore, mistakes of law, but only mistakes of law, may be rectified on appeal: Navarro Corporation v. Pittsburgh School District, 344 Pa. 429, 432 , 25 A.2d 808, 810 . . . ” (Emphasis in original.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.