Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 Pa. 381 - Higbee Will

Higbee Will’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

61 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently April 2002 · most notably Masciantonio Will (1958), Williams v. McCarroll (1953)

61 state decisions

320195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCown v. Fraser · Ash Will · Lawrence's Estate · Lare Will · Olshefski's Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The eccentricities which contestants proved, either alone or in combination with others, are insufficient to prove an unsound mind or lack of testamentary capacity: (citing cases). In Aggas v. Munnell, 302 Pa. 78, 85 , 152 A. 840 , the law is well stated: ‘Neither old age, nor its infirmities, including untidy habits, partial loss of memory, inability to recognize acquaintances, and incoherent speech, will deprive a person of the right to dispose of his own property. . . . Mr. Justice Kkphart, speaking for the Court, in Lawrence’s Est., 286 Pa. 58 , states, . . .: “Old age, sickness, distress, debility of body, peculiar beliefs and opinions, incapacity to do business, partial failure of memory, neither prove nor raise a presumption of incapacity.” ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.