Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 So. 2d 1010 - Fuller v. State

365 So. 2d 1010 - Fuller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2006

23 state decisions

1401978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nichols v. State · Cox v. State · Kennedy v. State · 50 Ala. App. 324 - Lucky v. State · 38 Ala. App. 299 - Vinet v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The grounds urged for a new trial must ordinarily have been preserved at the trial by timely and sufficient objections.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Thomas v. State · Deutcsh v. State
  2. “"[A] new trial will not be granted for matters pertaining to rulings, evidence, or occurrences at a trial, including erroneous conduct on the part of the court, counsel, or jury, unless timely and sufficient objections, requests, motions, or exceptions have been made and taken. Any grounds which might have been afforded by such matters are presumed to have been waived, except where such matters were unknown to applicant until after verdict and could not have been discovered by the exercise of reasonable diligence, and except in instances of fundamental errors which of themselves invalidate the trial."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 710 So. 2d 1276 - Williams v. State
  3. “"[W]hen they went in to reach a verdict, they would be kept together at the request of the Defendant."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 371 So. 2d 75 - Donahoo v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.