365 So. 2d 1304 - State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
68 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith (1995), 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey (1983)
68 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wainwright v. Stone · 305 So. 2d 514 - State v. James · 337 So. 2d 192 - State v. McCoy · State v. Murry · 315 So. 2d 749 - State v. Bluain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... have acquired historically and jurisprudentially a definite meaning.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Berthelot“"(1) The unnatural carnal copulation by a human being with another of the same sex or opposite sex or with an animal, except that anal sexual intercourse between two human beings shall not be deemed as a crime against nature when done under any of the circumstances described in R.S. 14:41, 14:42, 14:42.1 or 14:43. Emission is not necessary; and, when committed by a human being with another, the use of the genital organ of one of the offenders of whatever sex is sufficient to constitute the crime."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“We find no error in the determination of the trial judge here that the present defendant gave his informed consent to the waiver made in his presence by his attorney, especially in light of the facts that the judge had informed defendant not once, but twice, of his right to choose between a judge trial and a jury trial, and that the defendant was shown to have had prior experience as an accused in the trial of a criminal prosecution.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Santee · State v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.