Acker v. Acker’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
October 1987
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hechler v. Hechler · Howard v. Howard · Chaffin v. Grigsby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the instant situation appellant had not paid child support for approximately three years which was almost the entire time the parties had been divorced. During most of this time appellant clearly had the ability to pay support. Despite his own non-compliance appellant filed a motion to hold his former wife in contempt for her alleged failure to allow child visitation. On the day of the hearing on his motion for contempt, the husband, at long last, tendered a $25.00 payment toward future child support. The husband's conduct was both willful and intentional and clearly detrimental to the welfare of the infant child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a willful and intentional refusal to pay child support which is detrimental to the welfare of the child”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Olson v. Olson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.