¶1concurs. Our writ grant was obviously designed to permit the trial judge to rule on the merits of the plaintiff’s objection to discovery of some matters requested as unduly oppressive or as not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of relevant evidence.
365 So. 2d 229
Chaisson v. Thomas
Decided December 1, 1978
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1978-12-01
Decided 1978-12-01