365 So. 2d 335 - Turner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2015
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lane v. McFadyen · 45 Ala. App. 250 - Hughes v. State · Dawson v. State · Cannon v. Michigan Mut. Liability Co. · Driggers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] request for probation following sentencing does not extend the time for appeal from a judgment of conviction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Furthermore, the original granting or denial of probation is entirely within the discretion of the trial court and is not reviewable upon appeal from a judgment of conviction. Turner v. State , 365 So.2d 335 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 365 So.2d 336 (1978); Driggers v. State , 344 So.2d 226 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within 42 days (six weeks) after the entry of the sentence appealed from.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.