Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 SO2D 364 - Pinkston v. State

Pinkston v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 54 Ala. App. 254 - Hurst v. State · 48 Ala. App. 401 - Payne v. State · Mathis v. State · Divine v. State · 36 Ala. App. 310 - Brooks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]efore the transcribed statement was legally admissible, it was necessary that appellant approve the accuracy of the statement taken on the tape.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.