Goldberg v. Graser’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 29 U.S.C. § 260
Relies on George McClanahan and William Clinger v. William B. Mathews · Mumbower v. Callicott · Rothman v. Publicker Industries, Inc. · Shultz v. Hinojosa · Wright v. Carrigg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A per curiam affirmance without opinion does not bind the appellate court in another case to accept the conclusion of law on which the decision of the lower court was based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.