Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 S.W.2d 354 - Isenhower v. Bell

Isenhower v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Trenholm v. Ratcliff (1983), State National Bank of El Paso v. Farah Manufacturing Co. (1984)

3 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

170196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wagner v. Foster · Ramsey v. Dunlop · McCauley v. Consolidated Underwriters · Labbe v. Corbett · St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Murphree

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here one has been induced to enter into a contract by fraudulent representations, the person committing the fraud cannot defeat a claim for damages based upon a plea that the party defrauded might have discovered the truth by the exercise of proper care.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When the issue of fraud is raised, competent evidence that has a reasonable bearing on the issue is admissible and may be considered by the jury. All the facts and circumstances leading up to and connected with the transaction are, ordinarily, admissible. .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “piece together a point for the appellant from an examination of the transcript and the statement of facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.